2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 1994 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 2,400 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 780 kg more than 1994 Toyota Crown.
Because 1994 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia Shuma II | 1994 Toyota Crown | |
| Make | Kia | Toyota |
| Model | Shuma II | Crown |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1770 mm |
