2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 1995 Mercury Tracer
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mercury Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mercury Tracer would be higher. At 1,859 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mercury Tracer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Shuma II (101 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1995 Mercury Tracer. (87 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II should accelerate faster than 1995 Mercury Tracer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 863 kg more than 1995 Mercury Tracer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia Shuma II (148 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mercury Tracer. (146 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2005 Kia Shuma II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mercury Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Shuma II | 1995 Mercury Tracer | |
Make | Kia | Mercury |
Model | Shuma II | Tracer |
Year Released | 2005 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1593 cc | 1859 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 87 HP |
Torque | 148 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1958 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2510 mm |