2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 1996 Rover 200

To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 200 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Shuma II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 795 kg more than 1996 Rover 200.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Rover 200 (185 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1996 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Shuma II.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Kia Shuma II 1996 Rover 200
Make Kia Rover
Model Shuma II 200
Year Released 2005 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1793 cc 1993 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 109 HP 140 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 157 Nm 185 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 81 mm 84.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 87 mm 89 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 10.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 2000 kg 1205 kg
Vehicle Length 4530 mm 4280 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2640 mm 2510 mm