2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 1996 Toyota Picnic

To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota Picnic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota Picnic would be higher. At 1,988 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Picnic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota Picnic (126 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Picnic should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Shuma II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 660 kg more than 1996 Toyota Picnic.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota Picnic (178 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1996 Toyota Picnic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Shuma II.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Kia Shuma II 1996 Toyota Picnic
Make Kia Toyota
Model Shuma II Picnic
Year Released 2005 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1793 cc 1988 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 109 HP 126 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 157 Nm 178 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 81 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 87 mm 86 mm
Top Speed 196 km/hour 175 km/hour
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2000 kg 1340 kg
Vehicle Length 4530 mm 4540 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1630 mm
Wheelbase Size 2640 mm 2740 mm