2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 1997 Lexus LS
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Lexus LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Lexus LS would be higher. At 3,967 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Lexus LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Lexus LS (280 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Lexus LS should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Shuma II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Lexus LS weights approximately 609 kg more than 2005 Kia Shuma II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 Lexus LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Lexus LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Lexus LS (398 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1997 Lexus LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Shuma II. 1997 Lexus LS has automatic transmission and 2005 Kia Shuma II has manual transmission. 2005 Kia Shuma II will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Lexus LS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia Shuma II | 1997 Lexus LS | |
| Make | Kia | Lexus |
| Model | Shuma II | LS |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1792 cc | 3967 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 280 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 398 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 82.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 196 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.6 seconds | 6.9 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9 L/100km | 12.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 85 L |
