2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 1999 Nissan Z
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan Z would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan Z (197 HP) has 96 more horse power than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Shuma II.
Because 1999 Nissan Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan Z (245 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (148 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1999 Nissan Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Shuma II.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Shuma II | 1999 Nissan Z | |
Make | Kia | Nissan |
Model | Shuma II | Z |
Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1593 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 197 HP |
Torque | 148 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2450 mm |