2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora would be higher. At 3,473 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 356 kg more than 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora has automatic transmission and 2005 Kia Shuma II has manual transmission. 2005 Kia Shuma II will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia Shuma II | 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
| Make | Kia | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Shuma II | Aurora |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 3473 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1644 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2900 mm |
