2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 2000 Volvo S60
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 2,433 cc (5 cylinders), 2000 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo S60 (137 HP) has 36 more horse power than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Shuma II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 468 kg more than 2000 Volvo S60.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volvo S60 (285 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (148 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2000 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Shuma II.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Shuma II | 2000 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Kia | Volvo |
Model | Shuma II | S60 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1593 cc | 2433 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 137 HP |
Torque | 148 Nm | 285 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1958 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 70 L |