2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 2001 Suzuki Covie
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Suzuki Covie. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Suzuki Covie would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Shuma II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Shuma II (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2001 Suzuki Covie. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II should accelerate faster than 2001 Suzuki Covie. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 1250 kg more than 2001 Suzuki Covie. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Suzuki Covie (178 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (157 Nm). This means 2001 Suzuki Covie will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Shuma II.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Shuma II | 2001 Suzuki Covie | |
Make | Kia | Suzuki |
Model | Shuma II | Covie |
Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1327 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 2950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 50 L |