2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (145 HP) has 44 more horse power than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Shuma II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 473 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (310 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (148 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Shuma II.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Shuma II | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Kia | Mazda |
Model | Shuma II | 6 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1593 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 145 HP |
Torque | 148 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1958 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 64 L |