2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 1,792 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Shuma II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Shuma II (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 139 kg more than 2005 Kia Shuma II.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (157 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Shuma II.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Shuma II | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Kia | Mazda |
Model | Shuma II | 6 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1792 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 196 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.6 seconds | 11 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |