2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 2009 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia Shuma II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia Shuma II would be higher. At 1,593 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Shuma II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Cee'd (124 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Shuma II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 641 kg more than 2009 Kia Cee'd.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Kia Cee'd (155 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (148 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Shuma II.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Shuma II | 2009 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | Kia | Kia |
Model | Shuma II | Cee'd |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1593 cc | 1591 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 124 HP |
Torque | 148 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1958 kg | 1317 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 53 L |