2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 2009 Renault Trafic
To start off, 2009 Renault Trafic is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia Shuma II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia Shuma II would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Trafic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Shuma II (101 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2009 Renault Trafic. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Trafic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Trafic (241 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (148 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Trafic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Shuma II.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Shuma II | 2009 Renault Trafic | |
Make | Kia | Renault |
Model | Shuma II | Trafic |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1593 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 148 Nm | 241 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3100 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 90 L |