2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 2010 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2010 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia Shuma II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia Shuma II would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Daewoo Rezzo (103 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Shuma II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 611 kg more than 2010 Daewoo Rezzo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia Shuma II (148 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Daewoo Rezzo. (142 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2005 Kia Shuma II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia Shuma II | 2010 Daewoo Rezzo | |
| Make | Kia | Daewoo |
| Model | Shuma II | Rezzo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1593 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 103 HP |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1958 kg | 1347 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |
