2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia Shuma II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia Shuma II would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Shuma II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Shuma II.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia Shuma II (157 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (148 Nm). This means 2005 Kia Shuma II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Shuma II | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Kia | Holden |
Model | Shuma II | Cruze |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 148 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2685 mm |