2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia Shuma II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia Shuma II would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Shuma II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Shuma II (109 HP) has 41 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia Shuma II (157 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (115 Nm). This means 2005 Kia Shuma II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Shuma II | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Kia | Chevrolet |
Model | Shuma II | Aveo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1206 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 68 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 115 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 46 L |