2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 2012 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2012 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia Shuma II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia Shuma II would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Daewoo Tocsa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Daewoo Tocsa (153 HP) has 44 more horse power than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Daewoo Tocsa should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Shuma II.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Daewoo Tocsa (237 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (157 Nm). This means 2012 Daewoo Tocsa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Shuma II. 2012 Daewoo Tocsa has automatic transmission and 2005 Kia Shuma II has manual transmission. 2005 Kia Shuma II will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Daewoo Tocsa will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia Shuma II | 2012 Daewoo Tocsa | |
| Make | Kia | Daewoo |
| Model | Shuma II | Tocsa |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
