2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia Shuma II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia Shuma II would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 540 kg more than 2005 Kia Shuma II.
Because 2012 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia Shuma II | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Kia | Fisker |
| Model | Shuma II | Karma |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 36 L |
