2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia Shuma II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia Shuma II would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 629 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Kia Shuma II. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (155 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Shuma II.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia Shuma II | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Kia | Mini |
| Model | Shuma II | Countryman |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 111 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 155 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2087 kg | 1458 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 47 L |
