2005 Kia Shuma vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Shuma (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 230 kg more than 2005 Kia Shuma.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Cedric (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Shuma. (144 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1967 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Shuma.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia Shuma | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Kia | Nissan |
| Model | Shuma | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1594 cc | 2164 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2700 mm |
