2005 Lada 110 vs. 1993 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2005 Lada 110 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Suzuki Swift. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Suzuki Swift would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Lada 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lada 110 (90 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1993 Suzuki Swift. (66 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lada 110 should accelerate faster than 1993 Suzuki Swift. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lada 110 weights approximately 285 kg more than 1993 Suzuki Swift. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lada 110 (128 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Suzuki Swift. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Lada 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Suzuki Swift.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lada 110 | 1993 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Lada | Suzuki |
Model | 110 | Swift |
Year Released | 2005 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 74.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 75.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 830 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1590 mm |