2005 Lada 111 vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Lada 111. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Lada 111 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Lada 111 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 2005 Lada 111. (93 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2005 Lada 111.
Because 2009 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Lada 111, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Lada 111. (128 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Lada 111.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Lada 111 | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Lada | Mazda |
| Model | 111 | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1306 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 232 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 216 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 64 L |
