2005 Lada 2123 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2005 Lada 2123 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,690 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Lada 2123 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lada 2123 (76 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lada 2123 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lada 2123 weights approximately 556 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lada 2123 (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Lada 2123 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Lada 2123 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Lada | Zastava |
| Model | 2123 | 102 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1690 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2160 mm |
