2005 Lada 2123 vs. 2012 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2012 Nissan Juke is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Lada 2123. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Lada 2123 would be higher. At 1,690 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Lada 2123 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Juke (188 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2005 Lada 2123. (76 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Juke should accelerate faster than 2005 Lada 2123. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Juke weights approximately 8 kg more than 2005 Lada 2123. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan Juke (240 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Lada 2123. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Nissan Juke will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Lada 2123.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lada 2123 | 2012 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Lada | Nissan |
Model | 2123 | Juke |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1690 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 188 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1334 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2530 mm |