2005 Lada Niva vs. 1963 Mazda R 360
To start off, 2005 Lada Niva is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,690 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Lada Niva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lada Niva (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1963 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lada Niva should accelerate faster than 1963 Mazda R 360.
Because 2005 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Mazda R 360. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lada Niva (128 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Mazda R 360. (23 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Lada Niva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lada Niva | 1963 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | Niva | R 360 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Size | 1690 cc | 356 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 16 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 23 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 60 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 63 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 1770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |