2005 Lada Oka vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2005 Lada Oka is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 644 cc (2 cylinders), 2005 Lada Oka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 30 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mitsubishi Minica weights approximately 4 kg more than 2005 Lada Oka.
Because 1992 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Lada Oka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lada Oka (46 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mitsubishi Minica. (43 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Lada Oka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mitsubishi Minica.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lada Oka | 1992 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Lada | Mitsubishi |
Model | Oka | Minica |
Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 644 cc | 548 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 30 HP | 30 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 46 Nm | 43 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 636 kg | 640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3210 mm | 3200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2270 mm |