2005 Lancia Phedra vs. 1981 Mazda 929
To start off, 2005 Lancia Phedra is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Lancia Phedra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lancia Phedra (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1981 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lancia Phedra should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lancia Phedra weights approximately 462 kg more than 1981 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Lancia Phedra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lancia Phedra (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Lancia Phedra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Lancia Phedra | 1981 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Lancia | Mazda |
| Model | Phedra | 929 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1969 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 98 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1612 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2620 mm |
