2005 Lancia Phedra vs. 1994 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2005 Lancia Phedra is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Lancia Phedra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lancia Phedra (108 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lancia Phedra should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lancia Phedra weights approximately 807 kg more than 1994 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lancia Phedra (264 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Lancia Phedra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lancia Phedra | 1994 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Phedra | Midge |
Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 264 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1773 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1400 mm |