2005 Lancia Phedra vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Lancia Phedra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Lancia Phedra would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Lancia Phedra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo C30 (114 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2005 Lancia Phedra. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 2005 Lancia Phedra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lancia Phedra weights approximately 322 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (270 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Lancia Phedra. (264 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Lancia Phedra.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lancia Phedra | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Lancia | Volvo |
Model | Phedra | C30 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 264 Nm | 270 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1773 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 60 L |