2005 Land Rover Defender vs. 1977 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Defender is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,498 cc, 2005 Land Rover Defender is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Defender weights approximately 1098 kg more than 1977 Mazda RX-2.
Because 2005 Land Rover Defender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Defender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Defender (300 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Land Rover Defender will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Land Rover Defender | 1977 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
| Model | Defender | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2498 cc | 2292 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1950 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 9 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2058 kg | 960 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2480 mm |
