2005 Land Rover Discovery 3 vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Discovery 3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Discovery 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Discovery 3 (291 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Discovery 3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Discovery 3 (425 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Land Rover Discovery 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Land Rover Discovery 3 | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Land Rover | Triumph |
| Model | Discovery 3 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4394 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 291 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 425 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 76 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1660 mm |
