2005 Land Rover Freelander vs. 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Land Rover Freelander | 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Land Rover | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Freelander | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1959 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2489 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 174 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 104.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 91.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 6050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 104 L |
