2005 Land Rover Freelander vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (174 HP) has 114 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (240 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Land Rover Freelander | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
| Model | Freelander | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2489 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 174 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2540 mm |
