2005 Land Rover Freelander vs. 1963 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (174 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1963 Ford Zodiac. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Zodiac.
Because 2005 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Zodiac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (240 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Zodiac. (191 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover Freelander | 1963 Ford Zodiac | |
Make | Land Rover | Ford |
Model | Freelander | Zodiac |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2489 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 191 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 79.5 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 45 L |