2005 Land Rover Freelander vs. 1963 Lotus Elite
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (174 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite.
Because 2005 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus Elite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover Freelander | 1963 Lotus Elite | |
Make | Land Rover | Lotus |
Model | Freelander | Elite |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2489 cc | 1216 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 83 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 29 L |