2005 Land Rover Freelander vs. 1963 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (174 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1963 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 1963 Plymouth Valiant.
Because 2005 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Plymouth Valiant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover Freelander | 1963 Plymouth Valiant | |
Make | Land Rover | Plymouth |
Model | Freelander | Valiant |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2489 cc | 2789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 100 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2700 mm |