2005 Land Rover Freelander vs. 1967 Reliant Rebel
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Reliant Rebel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Reliant Rebel would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (174 HP) has 139 more horse power than 1967 Reliant Rebel. (35 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 1967 Reliant Rebel.
Because 2005 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Reliant Rebel. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (240 Nm) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Reliant Rebel. (51 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Reliant Rebel.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Land Rover Freelander | 1967 Reliant Rebel | |
| Make | Land Rover | Reliant |
| Model | Freelander | Rebel |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2489 cc | 748 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 174 HP | 35 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 51 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 7.8:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 38 L |
