2005 Land Rover Freelander vs. 1979 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (174 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1979 Nissan Cedric. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 1979 Nissan Cedric.
Because 2005 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Nissan Cedric. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (240 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Nissan Cedric. (147 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Land Rover Freelander | 1979 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
| Model | Freelander | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2489 cc | 1982 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 174 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2700 mm |
