2005 Land Rover Freelander vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (174 HP) has 88 more horse power than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. (86 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Because 2005 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (240 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Land Rover Freelander | 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Land Rover | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Freelander | Sigma |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2489 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 174 HP | 86 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2520 mm |
