2005 Land Rover Freelander vs. 1999 Mazda 626
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (174 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1999 Mazda 626. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda 626.
Because 2005 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (240 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda 626. (170 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover Freelander | 1999 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
Model | Freelander | 626 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2489 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 170 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.6:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 64 L |