2005 Land Rover Freelander vs. 1999 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda B2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda B2500 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (175 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1999 Mazda B2500. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda B2500.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mazda B2500 (266 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Land Rover Freelander. (240 Nm). This means 1999 Mazda B2500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Land Rover Freelander.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Land Rover Freelander | 1999 Mazda B2500 | |
| Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
| Model | Freelander | B2500 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 266 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2990 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 80 L |
