2005 Land Rover Freelander vs. 2000 Volvo V40
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volvo V40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volvo V40 would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (174 HP) has 66 more horse power than 2000 Volvo V40. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 2000 Volvo V40.
Because 2005 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Volvo V40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (240 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Volvo V40. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Volvo V40.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover Freelander | 2000 Volvo V40 | |
Make | Land Rover | Volvo |
Model | Freelander | V40 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2489 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 77 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 70 L |