2005 Land Rover Freelander vs. 2002 BMW Z3
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW Z3 (228 HP) has 54 more horse power than 2005 Land Rover Freelander. (174 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Land Rover Freelander.
Because 2005 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW Z3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW Z3 (301 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Land Rover Freelander. (240 Nm). This means 2002 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Land Rover Freelander.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover Freelander | 2002 BMW Z3 | |
Make | Land Rover | BMW |
Model | Freelander | Z3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2489 cc | 2996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 228 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 301 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 89.6 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 51 L |