2005 Land Rover Freelander vs. 2007 Mazda 5
To start off, 2007 Mazda 5 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Land Rover Freelander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Land Rover Freelander would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (174 HP) has 21 more horse power than 2007 Mazda 5. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 2007 Mazda 5.
Because 2005 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Mazda 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (240 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda 5. (201 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover Freelander | 2007 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
Model | Freelander | 5 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2489 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 201 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |