2005 Land Rover Freelander vs. 2008 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2008 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Land Rover Freelander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Land Rover Freelander would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2005 Land Rover Freelander. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2005 Land Rover Freelander.
Because 2005 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (240 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda RX-8. (220 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover Freelander | 2008 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
Model | Freelander | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 189 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 61 L |