2005 Land Rover Freelander vs. 2013 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2013 Subaru Outback is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Land Rover Freelander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Land Rover Freelander would be higher. At 2,500 cc (16 cylinders), 2013 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (174 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2013 Subaru Outback. (171 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 2013 Subaru Outback.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Freelander (240 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Subaru Outback. (236 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover Freelander | 2013 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Land Rover | Subaru |
Model | Freelander | Outback |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2489 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 171 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 236 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 94 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |