2005 Land Rover LR3 vs. 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300
To start off, 2005 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 would be higher. At 4,390 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover LR3 (300 HP) has 142 more horse power than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. (158 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover LR3 weights approximately 531 kg more than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Land Rover LR3 | 1962 Mercedes-Benz 300 | |
| Make | Land Rover | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | LR3 | 300 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4390 cc | 2996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 158 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2461 kg | 1930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 71 L |
