2005 Land Rover LR3 vs. 1964 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2005 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 4,390 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover LR3 (300 HP) has 200 more horse power than 1964 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Plymouth Valiant.
Because 2005 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Plymouth Valiant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Land Rover LR3 | 1964 Plymouth Valiant | |
| Make | Land Rover | Plymouth |
| Model | LR3 | Valiant |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4390 cc | 2789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 100 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2700 mm |
