2005 Land Rover LR3 vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,390 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover LR3 (300 HP) has 211 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover LR3 weights approximately 1291 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover LR3 (427 Nm) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Land Rover LR3 | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Land Rover | Triumph |
| Model | LR3 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4390 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2461 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 86 L | 64 L |
