2005 Land Rover LR3 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2005 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover LR3 weights approximately 631 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover LR3 | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Land Rover | Mitsubishi |
Model | LR3 | Challenger |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2461 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2730 mm |